KEYM Capital Corp deserves a different type of review from the private funds in this series. It is a Colorado corporation formed in 2026, not a limited partnership or LLC identified by the issuer as a conventional venture, hedge or private-equity fund. Yet its first Form D seeks up to $100 million, checks both "Equity" and "Pooled Investment Fund Interests," relies on Rule 506(c), reports a $100 minimum investment and says the offering may continue for more than one year. As of the October 6, 2026 filing, however, KEYM reported $0 sold and zero investors. The most unusual disclosure sits elsewhere in the same filing: despite being organized only in 2026, KEYM selected the revenue range "Over $100,000,000." That figure is self-reported on Form D and should not be treated as audited proof of more than $100 million in revenue without financial statements or other corroborating evidence.
KEY FINDINGS
The SEC filing itself is genuine and unusually ambitious. KEYM Capital Corp is CIK 0002158040, organized in Colorado in 2026 and based at 370 17th Street in Denver. The filing identifies Dominick Mc Grail King as executive officer, director and promoter. He also signs the Form D as a director.
KEYM selected "Investing" as its industry rather than checking "Pooled Investment Fund." That distinction is worth preserving because the securities section separately checks both equity and pooled investment fund interests. In other words, the public filing does not fit neatly into the standard pattern of a corporation raising ordinary operating-company equity, nor does the issuer classify itself in Item 4 as a conventional pooled investment fund.
The offering seeks $100 million. None had been sold when the notice was filed and there were zero investors. The first-sale date is nevertheless reported as October 6, 2026, the same date as the filing. That combination is unusual because a reported first-sale date normally indicates that an investor has become contractually committed, while Item 14 still reports zero investors and Item 13 reports $0 sold. Investors should ask the issuer or its securities counsel to explain how those fields reconcile.
RULE 506(c), NOT A QUIET PRIVATE PLACEMENT
KEYM relies on Rule 506(c), which is important because this exemption differs from the Rule 506(b) structure used by many other issuers reviewed by FilingDossier.
A Rule 506(c) issuer can use general solicitation and advertising, but purchasers must be accredited investors and the issuer must take reasonable steps to verify accredited status. That means a public website, online promotion or broad solicitation would not necessarily contradict the exemption claimed here.
However, a Form D remains only a notice filing. It does not mean the SEC reviewed KEYM's business model, confirmed its revenue, approved its investment product or verified that the company can raise $100 million.
At the filing date, the public record showed no completed fundraising: $0 sold and zero investors.
THE OVER-$100-MILLION REVENUE DISCLOSURE
The most important diligence issue is Item 5.
KEYM Capital Corp states that it was organized in 2026. In the issuer-size section, it selects the revenue range "Over $100,000,000."
That is a striking combination for a newly formed corporation.
Form D does not require the issuer to upload audited income statements supporting the selected revenue band. Therefore, the field should be described accurately as a company-reported figure, not as independently verified revenue.
If KEYM genuinely generated more than $100 million of revenue during or around its first year of existence, investors should expect meaningful supporting documentation: audited or reviewed financial statements, tax filings, bank statements, contracts, portfolio statements or other accounting records capable of reconciling that revenue.
Until those documents are available, the SEC filing proves that KEYM reported itself in the highest revenue category. It does not independently prove the underlying revenue.
This issue is especially important because a $100 million offering can look more credible when viewed next to a claimed $100 million-plus revenue figure. Investors should avoid allowing one self-reported Form D field to validate another.
$0 SOLD AND ZERO INVESTORS
KEYM's $100 million figure is the proposed offering size, not money already raised.
The Form D reports:
$100,000,000 total offering; $0 sold; $100,000,000 remaining; and 0 investors.
Those numbers should be kept together whenever the offering is described. Saying simply that KEYM "filed a $100 million SEC offering" is technically true but can create the false impression that $100 million has been committed or raised.
The more accurate description is that KEYM filed notice of an intended $100 million exempt offering and had reported no capital sold as of October 6.
This distinction is central to scam-risk research because large Form D target amounts frequently appear in promotional material as though they represent assets under management, financing already secured or company valuation. They do not.
SALES COMPENSATION DESERVES CLOSER ATTENTION
KEYM's filing also differs from many early-stage Form D issuers because it anticipates compensation related to selling the offering.
Dominick Mc Grail King is named in Item 12 as the sales-compensation recipient. The filing lists no recipient CRD number and no associated broker or dealer. It also estimates $10,000 in sales commissions and another $10,000 in finder's fees.
Those disclosures do not prove that unlawful brokerage activity is occurring. They do create an obvious diligence question.
Investors should ask who will actually solicit securities, what activities will generate the commission or finder compensation, whether any compensated party is required to be registered as a broker-dealer or associated person, and what exemption or legal analysis supports the compensation arrangement if no broker-dealer is involved.
The SEC Form D alone cannot answer those questions.
THE $1 MILLION RELATED-PERSON PAYMENT DISCLOSURE
Item 16 is another feature that separates KEYM from most of the C-group filings.
KEYM estimates that $1,000,000 of gross offering proceeds may be used for payments to persons required to be identified as executive officers, directors or promoters.
Dominick Mc Grail King is the only person identified in Item 3.
The Form D does not explain the nature of the potential $1 million payment. It could represent compensation, reimbursement, fees, expenses or another permitted use, but the document does not specify which.
That makes the private offering memorandum or subscription package especially important. Investors considering the offering should determine exactly how much of their capital can be paid to insiders, when those payments occur, what services are provided in return and whether the amount changes depending on how much of the $100 million target is actually raised.
The fact that the figure is an estimate should also be preserved. It is not evidence that $1 million has already been paid.
THE DOMINICK MC GRAIL KING FILING TRAIL
A deeper search shows that Dominick Mc Grail King is not appearing in SEC Form D records for the first time.
Other recent investing-related issuers have also named him.
FINZR LTD filed a Rule 506(c) Form D in September 2026 for a $100 million offering. That filing also reported $0 sold, zero investors, a $100 minimum, equity and pooled investment fund interests, and Dominick Mc Grail King as the sales-compensation recipient without a listed CRD number or associated broker-dealer.
SEC-linked records subsequently show the same CIK under names including VIRELTO LTD and previously SafeDamon Ltd, demonstrating that the issuer associated with that CIK has gone through name changes.
An earlier issuer, Rthae Crypto Finance Ltd, also named Dominick Mc Grail King and filed an investing-category Form D. That offering sought $20 million and likewise showed $0 sold and zero investors in the filing reviewed.
This pattern is highly relevant, but it needs to be interpreted carefully.
The presence of the same person across multiple issuers does not by itself establish that the companies are legally affiliated, share assets, use the same investors or constitute one investment organization. It does establish that the individual associated with KEYM has appeared in multiple exempt-offering filings involving investing businesses.
For investors, that history creates additional diligence material. They can ask what happened to the earlier offerings, whether they ever raised capital, whether investors received interests, whether the companies remain active, and how KEYM differs operationally from the earlier entities.
WEBSITE AND PUBLIC-IDENTITY CHECK
The KEYM Form D contains an email address using the keymcapital.com domain. That provides some evidence that the issuer claims use of that domain.
However, we were not able to independently verify a substantive public website at that domain through the sources reviewed. For that reason, FilingDossier does not treat keymcapital.com as a verified operating website in the structured data above.
This is another important distinction. A domain appearing inside an email address on Form D is evidence of a claimed contact channel; it is not automatically evidence of a mature business website, investment platform or independently verified operating history.
Investors should inspect the domain directly, confirm company ownership and compare any public claims with the legal entity and address shown in EDGAR.
NO CRD OR IDENTIFIED ADVISER IN THE FORM D
KEYM's filing does not identify an investment adviser, adviser CRD number or associated broker-dealer.
That matters because names such as "Capital Corp" and an "Investing" industry classification can sound regulated even when they do not establish any particular financial-services license.
A Form D filing does not turn an issuer into an SEC-registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, investment company or exchange.
The public filing instead establishes a narrower fact: KEYM Capital Corp is offering securities under Rule 506(c).
Anyone being told that KEYM is "SEC registered" should therefore ask what registration is being referenced. The issuer has an SEC CIK and Form D filing. That is not the same regulatory status as an SEC-registered investment adviser or FINRA-member broker-dealer.
WHAT WE THINK
KEYM is one of the more diligence-intensive C-group issuers because several unusual facts occur in a single new filing.
The company was organized in 2026 but reports a revenue range above $100 million. It seeks another $100 million through a Rule 506(c) offering but reported no capital sold and no investors. It checks pooled investment fund interests despite categorizing its industry as Investing rather than Pooled Investment Fund. It anticipates both sales commissions and finder's fees, names a recipient without a CRD or associated broker-dealer, and estimates that up to $1 million of offering proceeds may go to related persons.
None of those facts alone proves misconduct.
Together, however, they make independent documentation unusually important.
A sophisticated investor should not fund this offering based simply on the existence of the Form D. The natural next documents would be financial statements supporting the reported revenue band, corporate ownership records, a complete use-of-proceeds schedule, the private placement memorandum, subscription agreement, evidence supporting any claimed investment portfolio and legal analysis regarding securities-sales compensation.
RISK POINTS
The first issue is the gap between the $100 million target and current fundraising. As of the filing date, no securities had been reported sold and there were zero investors.
The second is the reported revenue category. A company formed in 2026 selecting "Over $100,000,000" is sufficiently unusual that independent financial verification should be a priority.
The third is the apparent inconsistency between a reported October 6 first sale and simultaneous disclosure of $0 sold and zero investors. The filing does not explain the discrepancy.
The fourth is sales compensation. The Form D anticipates both commissions and finder's fees while listing no associated broker-dealer or CRD for the named recipient.
The fifth is related-person economics. Up to an estimated $1 million of offering proceeds may be paid to persons within the executive/director/promoter disclosure, but Form D does not explain those payments.
The sixth is regulatory-status confusion. The filing does not establish that KEYM or Dominick Mc Grail King is an SEC-registered investment adviser or registered broker-dealer.
The seventh is the broader filing history. The same individual appears in other investing-related Form D offerings, including FINZR/VIRELTO and Rthae Crypto Finance. Investors should investigate the outcome of those offerings rather than treating each new issuer in isolation.
FINAL ASSESSMENT
KEYM Capital Corp has a genuine SEC Form D. That part is straightforward. The October 6, 2026 filing confirms a Colorado corporation formed in 2026 and an intended $100 million Rule 506(c) offering.
What the filing does not establish is equally important. It does not show that KEYM has raised $100 million; it reports $0 sold. It does not independently prove more than $100 million in revenue; that is the revenue range selected by the issuer. It does not identify an SEC-registered adviser or associated broker-dealer. And it does not explain the estimated $1 million payment to related persons or the proposed commission and finder-fee structure.
The filing trail of Dominick Mc Grail King also justifies deeper historical diligence because materially similar Form D structures appear under other issuer names. That history is not proof of fraud, but it is relevant when assessing management experience, prior fundraising outcomes and consistency of representations.
We found insufficient evidence from the reviewed public materials to label KEYM Capital Corp a confirmed scam. At the same time, this is not a filing where the existence of an SEC record should be treated as strong standalone reassurance. The combination of a newly formed issuer, $100 million target, zero reported investors, self-reported $100 million-plus revenue range, proposed insider payments and identifiable prior offering activity creates a higher need for documentary verification than a routine Form D review.
For investors, the most important next step is not another search for the words "SEC registered." It is obtaining financial statements, proof of operating revenue and assets, ownership records, offering documents, use-of-proceeds detail and a clear explanation of who is legally permitted to solicit the securities and receive transaction-based compensation.