RESEARCH

Is Ecosystem Investment Partners Legit? SEC Review, $1.3B AUM, $400M EIP V & Natural Capital Strategy 2026

Is Ecosystem Investment Partners Legit? SEC Review, $1.3B AUM, $400M EIP V & Natural Capital Strategy 2026

The second is entitlement and approval risk. Purchasing suitable land does not guarantee that regulators will approve a mitigation bank or release the expected number of credits. Investors should examine how EIP underwrites regulatory pathways before committing large amounts of restoration capital.

The third is ecological-performance risk. Wetlands, streams and habitats are complex natural systems. Drought, flooding, invasive species, wildfire, changing hydrology, storms or unexpected ecological responses can delay or reduce successful restoration. EIP's Pay for Performance approach can make this particularly relevant because the business may bear significant costs before receiving payment for verified outcomes.

The fourth is construction and cost risk. Large-scale restoration can require grading, channel construction, vegetation, erosion control, water-management infrastructure, long-term maintenance and specialist engineering. Inflation in labor, equipment and materials can reduce project economics.

The fifth is geographic-market risk. Mitigation credits are generally not perfectly fungible across the country. Credits often need to satisfy specific watershed, habitat, species or service-area requirements. A project can therefore have strong ecological quality yet weak local commercial demand.

The sixth is duration and liquidity. EIP's investment funds are private vehicles holding long-duration real assets and restoration projects. LP interests should be assumed to be illiquid. A project may require years before full credit release and monetization, while fund lives can extend if assets take longer to mature.

The seventh is valuation risk. There is no continuously traded public market for every mitigation bank or restoration project. Managers may need to value land, expected future credit sales and partially completed restoration using models and assumptions. Investors should understand the methodology, third-party appraisal process and audit procedures.

The eighth is climate risk itself. Restoration can improve ecosystem resilience, but climate change can alter rainfall, sea levels, wildfire patterns and habitat suitability. Those changes can affect both project costs and ecological success.

The ninth is political and policy risk. Environmental regulation is politically contested in the United States, and federal policy can change materially across administrations. A diversified nationwide portfolio may reduce dependence on one state or agency, but it does not eliminate policy exposure.

The tenth is fund-level deployment risk. EIP V closed above $400 million and follows a $454.5 million predecessor. Large pools of capital require a continuing pipeline of projects with sufficient expected returns. Investors should examine how much V has already been invested, how much remains committed to projects, and whether competitive pressure for attractive restoration assets is affecting entry pricing.

REPUTATION, TRANSPARENCY AND FINAL ASSESSMENT

EIP's institutional transparency is strong for a private natural-capital manager. The firm has an official website with detailed project descriptions, a public management team, a regulatory disclaimer linking directly to its SEC adviser status, a long Form ADV history, multiple Form D fund entities and publicly documented fund closes. Its SEC registration began in 2013 and remains approved. The latest available March 31, 2026 regulatory data reports approximately $1.3 billion of discretionary AUM across seven client relationships and 20 advisers. (adviserinfo.sec.gov) (ria-intel.com)

The strongest point for FilingDossier is that EIP's environmental claims are tied to actual physical projects. The firm publicly identifies restoration sites, project types and geographic regions, while third-party institutional capital and fund closes can be independently corroborated. This is materially different from a manager using "natural capital" primarily as marketing language without identifiable underlying projects.

The most important limitation is that public information still does not substitute for fund-level performance. Neither EIP's website nor Form D gives prospective LPs a complete history of gross IRR, net IRR, TVPI, DPI, RVPI, realized losses, current project valuations or write-offs by fund. A serious institutional review should therefore obtain audited financial statements, vintage performance, project-level cost and revenue history, current unsold credit inventory, valuation policy, fee terms, GP commitment, use of subscription facilities, leverage, insurance, project concentration and fund extension provisions.

EIP should also not be evaluated like a conventional buyout firm. Its returns depend on a distinctive combination of real-estate acquisition, regulation, science, environmental construction and monetization of legally recognized ecological value. That specialization creates both barriers to entry and unusual risks.

The final conclusion is therefore strong on identity and operating legitimacy but necessarily project- and fund-specific on investment quality. Ecosystem Investment Partners has operated since 2006, has been SEC registered since 2013, reports approximately $1.3 billion of 2026 regulatory AUM, has raised nearly $1.5 billion since inception and closed its fifth fund at more than $400 million in 2025. Its predecessor EIP IV closed at $454.5 million, EIP III at $303 million and EIP II at $181 million. Those facts establish an experienced institutional natural-capital platform.

They do not guarantee that every ecological-restoration project will generate the expected credits, timing or return.

SEC registration confirms that Ecosystem Investment Partners, LLC is a registered investment adviser. Form D filings confirm private securities offerings by its individual funds. Neither represents SEC approval of EIP's projects, ecological outcomes, fund valuations or future investment performance.

SEC SNAPSHOT

REVIEWED BRAND: Ecosystem Investment Partners

ABBREVIATION: EIP

FOUNDED: 2006

HEADQUARTERS: 5550 Newbury Street, Suite B Baltimore, Maryland 21209

ADDITIONAL OFFICE: Sausalito, California

PRIMARY STRATEGY: Natural Capital Ecological Restoration Environmental Real Assets Mitigation Banking Pay for Performance Restoration

CORE ASSET / PROJECT TYPES: Wetlands Streams Water quality Wildlife habitat Biodiversity Watersheds Conservation land Mitigation banks

Ecosystem Investment Partners, LLC

SEC FILE: 801-77667

SEC STATUS: Registered Investment Adviser

SEC REGISTRATION EFFECTIVE: March 12, 2013

LATEST REGULATORY DATA DATE: March 31, 2026

APPROXIMATE REGULATORY AUM: $1.3 billion

DISCRETIONARY AUM: Approximately $1.3 billion

NON-DISCRETIONARY AUM: $0

ADVISORY ACCOUNTS: 7

INVESTMENT ADVISORY EMPLOYEES: 20

TOTAL CAPITAL RAISED SINCE INCEPTION: Nearly $1.5 billion Company reported after EIP V close

CURRENT FLAGSHIP:

Ecosystem Investment Partners V, L.P.

YEAR ORGANIZED: 2024

FINAL CLOSE: October 8, 2025

CAPITAL COMMITMENTS: More than $400 million

INDEPENDENT PRESS FIGURE: Approximately $401.3 million

GENERAL PARTNER: EIP Partners V, LLC

FORM D RELATED PERSON: Nicholas Dilks

FORM D SIGNER ON 2025 AMENDMENT: Adam Davis

SIGNER ROLE: Manager of General Partner

FUND STRATEGY: Large-scale wetland, stream, water-quality, biodiversity and habitat mitigation and restoration projects across the United States

EIP V DEPLOYMENT REPORTED AROUND FINAL CLOSE: More than $125 million across nine projects according to outside reporting

SELECT EIP V INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR DISCLOSURES REPORTED PUBLICLY: Ingka Investments Sampension Lærernes Pension AP Pension Additional U.S. and European pension funds Family offices Foundations

PREVIOUS FLAGSHIP:

Ecosystem Investment Partners IV, L.P.

CIK: 0001779710

JURISDICTION: Delaware

YEAR ORGANIZED: 2019

FINAL CLOSE: February 2020

FINAL SIZE: $454.5 million

STATUS: Oversubscribed Closed at hard cap

FUNDRAISING PERIOD: Less than 10 months

GLOBAL PLACEMENT AGENT: Monument Group

GENERAL PARTNER STRUCTURE: EIP Partners IV, L.P. EIP Partners IV, L.L.C.

EARLIER FUND HISTORY:

EIP II: $181 million Raised May 2012

EIP III: $303 million Raised February 2016

EIP IV: $454.5 million Closed February 2020

EIP V: $400 million+ Closed October 2025

IMPORTANT SCALE DISTINCTION:

Nearly $1.5B = Cumulative capital raised since EIP's founding.

Approximately $1.3B = 2026 regulatory AUM of Ecosystem Investment Partners, LLC.

$400M+ = Capital commitments to EIP V and related entities.

$454.5M = EIP IV final fund size.

Do not treat these as interchangeable numbers.

CURRENT LEADERSHIP:

Nick Dilks Managing Partner

Heath Rushing Managing Partner

Adam Davis Co-Founder and Managing Partner

Aidan Riordan Partner

Catherine Carmen Managing Director Head of Investor Relations

Kyle Graham Managing Director Head of Operations and Policy

Nelly G. Perkins Managing Director of Finance Chief Compliance Officer

Kevin Roush Managing Director

Glen Williams Managing Director

CORE BUSINESS MODEL:

Acquire or control ecologically significant land Design and finance restoration Obtain regulatory approvals Restore / conserve ecological resources Generate verified mitigation credits or contracted outcomes Sell credits / outcomes to customers with regulatory or restoration requirements Maintain required long-term protection and stewardship

PRIMARY CUSTOMER NEEDS:

Wetland mitigation Stream mitigation Habitat mitigation Water-quality compliance Customized ecological restoration Infrastructure-related environmental obligations Development permitting requirements

SELECT PUBLICLY IDENTIFIED PROJECTS:

Mississippi & Superior Mitigation Bank Large-scale bog restoration

Chesapeake Bay Stream / water-quality restoration

Riverpark Mitigation Bank California wildlife-corridor restoration

Appalachia Region Water-quality and aquatic-habitat restoration

Old Florida & Upper Coastal Mitigation Bank Southwest Florida wetland restoration

Sacramento Bay Delta Fish and habitat restoration

WEBSITE / REGULATORY PENETRATION:

Official website — CONFIRMED SEC RIA status — CONFIRMED CRD / SEC number — CONFIRMED 2006 founding — CONFIRMED EIP V fund entity — CONFIRMED EIP IV fund entity — CONFIRMED General partner entities — CONFIRMED Management-team continuity — CONFIRMED $400M+ EIP V close — CONFIRMED $454.5M EIP IV close — CONFIRMED Nearly $1.5B cumulative capital raised — COMPANY REPORTED Approximately $1.3B 2026 regulatory AUM — SEC ADV-DERIVED Real restoration projects — CONFIRMED Institutional LP participation — INDEPENDENTLY REPORTED Current fund-level net performance — NOT PUBLICLY ESTABLISHED Current project-by-project NAV — NOT PUBLICLY ESTABLISHED

CORE INVESTOR QUESTIONS:

What is EIP V's current called capital How much is currently invested How much remains uncalled What are gross IRR and net IRR for EIP II, III and IV What are DPI, TVPI and RVPI How much value is realized versus unrealized What percentage of expected revenue depends on unsold mitigation credits What is the average time from land acquisition to first credit release What percentage of proposed credits historically receives final regulatory approval How much credit inventory has aged longer than expected What is current geographic concentration What portion of NAV is in California, Florida, Appalachia or other major regions What agencies approve each project's credits How are unsold credits valued Are independent appraisals used What happens if ecological milestones are missed What insurance protects restoration projects How much construction-cost inflation has affected recent projects Does the fund use asset-level or fund-level leverage Are subscription credit facilities used What management fee applies What carried interest applies What is the GP commitment What project-development and monitoring expenses are charged to funds What long-term stewardship liabilities remain after credit sales How are environmental liabilities allocated What fund-extension rights exist How are regulatory policy changes stress-tested

CORE RISKS:

Environmental regulatory changes Mitigation-credit approval risk Credit demand and pricing risk Geographic service-area concentration Ecological performance risk Flood / drought / wildfire / storm risk Climate-change effects Construction cost overruns Engineering risk Permitting delays Land acquisition risk Long project duration Illiquidity Valuation subjectivity Unsold mitigation-credit inventory Political and policy changes Project concentration Fund deployment risk Competition for suitable land Interest-rate / financing risk Long-term stewardship obligations Private-fund fee and carry drag

INDEPENDENT CONCLUSION:

Ecosystem Investment Partners has one of the more distinctive and independently verifiable strategies in the U.S. private real-assets market.

Its evidence chain includes:

A 2006 founding. SEC investment-adviser registration since 2013. CRD 165149 / SEC 801-77667. Approximately $1.3 billion of 2026 regulatory AUM. Nearly $1.5 billion of cumulative capital raised. Five generations of investment funds. A $454.5 million EIP IV. A $400 million-plus EIP V. Institutional U.S. and European LP participation. A national portfolio of identifiable restoration projects. And a management team combining investment, environmental, engineering and regulatory expertise.

The platform therefore has a substantially stronger operating and regulatory footprint than a newly launched environmental investment fund.

The important diligence question is not whether EIP exists.

It is whether individual restoration projects can generate approved ecological credits and contracted outcomes at the values and within the timelines assumed by the fund.

For LPs, the decisive evidence should include audited fund performance, project-level valuations, mitigation-credit inventories, regulatory approval schedules, construction budgets, realized credit sales and complete fee economics.

EIP's environmental benefit and its investment economics are closely linked, but neither guarantees the other.

SEC registration confirms Ecosystem Investment Partners, LLC as a registered investment adviser.

Form D confirms exempt private securities offerings by EIP funds.

Neither constitutes SEC approval of the funds, ecological projects, mitigation credits or future investment returns.

PRIMARY EVIDENCE REVIEWED:

U.S. SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure Ecosystem Investment Partners, LLC CRD 165149 SEC 801-77667

2026 Form ADV-derived regulatory data March 31, 2026 Approximately $1.3B regulatory AUM

U.S. SEC EDGAR Ecosystem Investment Partners V, L.P. CIK 0002009811

U.S. SEC EDGAR Ecosystem Investment Partners IV, L.P. CIK 0001779710

Ecosystem Investment Partners official website Firm history Investment strategy Management team Active projects Regulatory disclosure

Ecosystem Investment Partners October 8, 2025 EIP V final-close announcement

Ecosystem Investment Partners February 2020 EIP IV final-close announcement

Wall Street Journal / independent reporting EIP V fundraising, institutional investors and deployment context

Verification note: SEC.gov and the relevant regulator's official records remain authoritative. This site's research is independent editorial content.